Nos. 2267, 2268.Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
July 24, 1941.
On Petitions to Review the Decisions of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.
Arthur A. Armstrong, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen. (Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Samuel H. Levy, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., on the brief), for petitioner.
Richard M. Davis, of Denver, Colo. (Quigg Newton, Jr., and Newton, Davis Drinkwater, all of Denver, Colo., on the brief), for respondent.
Before PHILLIPS, HUXMAN, and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The ultimate questions here presented are identical with those considered by the court in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Cement Investors, Inc., 10 Cir., 122 F.2d 380, this day decided, the facts being substantially the same, except as to the amount of bonds involved and the cost thereof to the respective taxpayers.
Therefore, on authority of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Cement Investors, Inc., the orders of the Board of Tax Appeals are respectively affirmed.
Page 417
Page 419