No. 172-70.United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
June 10, 1970.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.
Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, and PICKETT and HICKEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Jenkins was notified that this court was considering summary affirmance, and afforded an opportunity to file a memorandum opposing such disposition. He has not done so. Nonetheless, examination of the file and record prompts the conclusion that the single question presented is so unsubstantial as not to warrant further argument. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in its Order (D.Colo. 1970).
Page 841
32 F.4th 1259 (2022) DENVER HOMELESS OUT LOUD; Charles Davis; Michael Lamb; Sharron Meitzen; Rick…
684 F.3d 963 (2012) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam FROST, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-1122.United…
962 F.3d 1253 (2020) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Abel Eduardo CRISTERNA-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No.…
PUBLISH ?UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS? FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ ESTATE OF VERA CUMMINGS,…
United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE…
United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH…